The Hazy Cloud of Confused Thinking

Entries from August 2007

Yet another post about Sprint’s broadband

August 30, 2007 · Leave a Comment

So, what could be more  testworthy of a broadband card than looking up online scores of the India England Cricket ODI on cricinfo constantly while on a train.

And while, I have just now closed that window – it has to do more with the fact that my team – India – is getting its ass handed back to them by a pair of unknown English tailenders than anything to do with the performance of the broadband card.

The card as usual  – performed impeccably. All the while, when my conference calls on ATT kept getting dropped. So much for the fewest dropped calls.

Go to ATT if you have a maniacal obsession with the iPhone. For network, go to Verizon Wireless. Or Sprint.

Categories: Wireless

123 Nuclear Deal on Hold

August 30, 2007 · 7 Comments

As of today, the UPA and Left have agreed on a compromise – one that puts the nuclear deal on hold.

Does this mean that the nuclear deal is dead. Clearly no. Because the next steps are to engage the NSG or the Nuclear Suppliers Group – a loose consortium of 40 nations – to allow Uranium supplies to be made to India.

Of course, any delays will give China more lobbying time with the NSG – to ensure they dont ratify the treaty with India as has been stated in the media. Of course, that should make our Left happy.

Of course, India shouldn’t get its own flavor of McCarthy-ism. Dissent is good when it involves healthy debate – that after all, is the essence of democracy. So I would cautiously welcome the fact-finding committee – but my concern is that when an opposition is based primarily on doctrinal grounds as opposed to real facts – what “facts” would allay the Left fears.

I don’t state this lightly. I was recently watching an edition of “We, the People” – a show hosted by Burkha Dutt on NDTV – and Nilotpal Basu from CPI(M) was representing the Left. His whole argument throughout the debate were the following:

  • India will be made a second class country to follow the United States in its dirty deeds
  • The nuclear deal is not a deal but a strategic pact between India and the United States
  • India’s foreign policy will be decided by the US Senate once the deed is done
  • India will be a stooge always expected to follow the United States’ diktats in all its international affairs
  • India will lose its nuclear program to the United States
  • India will have to support blunders like the Iraq invasion

If you read Mr. Basu’s points, all of them are based on doctrinal bindings of the Left where aligning with the capitalist West ( and its “leader” – the United States) is never ever an option. Never mind the changed geo-political realities.

So I am not exactly certain as to what the fact finding committee will achieve. Or how the Left will be more at ease.

The Left are a moribund political entity. In my view, they would have been a non-entity a long time ago – if the opposition in West Bengal and Kerala were a little more organized and effective. And honest.

However regardless of their abysmal governance record, their very questionable stance pre-independence and during the 1962 Indo-China war, they are still a force primarily in West Bengal and Kerala.

However what is sad is that they will hold a deal to ransom – that is probably the best negotiated pact in the history of the Indian Republic, that is pragmatic and most importantly, that is exactly what we need to move into the next round of paradigm shifting nation building in the next 20 years.

However, a political entity, after all is a reflection of its people. Till the time when we still have sizable portions of the population who feel India isnt strong, big, prosperous, mature and stable enough not to be “America’s donkey”, “American Stooge”, “Second-Class Nation”, “Servant Democracy” or a hundred other choice epithets coined by its own people – till the time we don’t recognize our eminence, our overwhelming size – physical, fiduciary and democratically and our strategic importance to the whole civilized world – these parties will continue to exist – and try its best to keep us in moribund mediocrity.

Sad day. Politics triumphs again. Over common sense.

Categories: 123 Nuclear Deal · Current Affairs · Hypocrisy · India · Opinion · Philippic · Politics

Indo-US 123 Nuclear Deal: A follow up

August 29, 2007 · 15 Comments

In the spirit of providing updates, I wanted to write about another controversy I am closely following – the 123 nuclear deal. Dweep Chanana of The Discomfort Zone provided me a link of his latest update on the deal. I find his writing cogent, thankfully bereft of emotions and logically articulated.

Enough has been said about the deal – what the deal “really” is about. What does it mean for Indian foreign policy, whether this constitutes abdicating our rights to deciding our foreign policy and so on.

As I wrote on my previous post, the nuclear deal, without going into the minutiae, is a vindication of India’s fundamental policies since Independence. Whether we agree with how much good it did to our long term strategic interests, our foreign policy has fundamentally, since 1947, with a few exceptions, has been based on peaceful dictates of non-interference in other nations’ affairs, non-export of armaments and maintaining theoretical non-alignment with either the NATO or the Warsaw Pact nations. Yes, we were closer to the Soviet establishment – but then a lot of that can be traced to the inherent distrust of capitalistic principles that we perceived we fought to win our freedom.

So a combination of factors came together to enable the nuclear deal to happen:

From America’s standpoint:

  • A geo-political imperative of the United States to have a strategic partner in Asia – a partner that aligned with the fundamental tenets of the United States
  • An appreciation of India’s impeccable nuclear non-proliferation record.
  • A growing Indian economy which leads to huge increase of energy needs – and consequently a huge market for Nuclear Supplier companies, primarily those of the United States
  • India’s refusal to sign the NPT led to its nuclear facilities be closed to foreign inspectors. To the United States’, this was a beginning of increased transparency in Indian civilian nuclear installations like the Tarapore reactor. ( India’s military nuclear installations still remain strictly off-limits)
  • Lastly, as per the detractors of the Nuclear Deal, this is a way for the United States to control Indian foreign policy by linking, among other things, the validity of the deal with India’s dealings with Iran and other nations that America classifies as rogue.


From India’s standpoint:

  • We have a huge (and growing) energy gap. India currently produces 78,500 MW of power. India needs to add 20,000 MW of generation capacity each year to meet its energy goals by 2012. It is unrealistic to expect India to achieve that kind of generation capacity using traditional coal or gas powered generation plants. And then there is the small something called environment. We absolutely have to think Nuclear. There is, unfortunately, no alternative.
  • We dont have enough nuclear fuel to produce the kind of nuclear power we need.( the details can be gotten into – I leave it bereft of specificity for purposes of clarity). Lets just say we need the NSG or the Nuclear Suppliers Group to provide us Uranium to create enough fission to produce all the power we need.Our current process is too complicated, inefficient, cost restrictive and non scalable.
  • India can leapfrog the technological barrier without going through the process of re-inventing the wheel by importing nuclear reactors from nations with more sophisticated technology like the United States and France. A layman’s analogy would be how we leapfrogged the landline phone deployment to directly go to cell phones. We didnt go through some of the growing pains that the more developed nations went through – consequently we have a very evolved telecom landscape and service portfolio. Ditto for Nuclear Reactors.
  • We negotiated deftly enough ensure our military nuclear installations are not impacted by this deal. Yes, per the Hyde Act, conducting a nuclear tests enables the United States to have the option of negating the 123 deal – but like I have been shouting myself hoarse, noone conducts, or needs to conduct a nuclear tests other than for belligerent flexing of muscles. And for all of our sake, I hope we dont suffer from such existential insecurities to justify that
  • And lastly, I think there is a small minority of political thinkers in India – on both the Right and the UPA – that realizes that a long term strategic partnership with the United States might not be such a bad thing – there is a vast middle class of young Indians – for who the United States represents an aspiration – and whether we like it or not – the United States drives the world economy – and China’s and India’s along with it. However, unlike China, we aren’t a communist police state.

Now, since both the United States and India had a very well defined aspirations – it is obvious that the Nuclear Deal is a mixed bag. And depending on the way one decides to look at it, there are both positives and negatives – both for India and the United States.

However, the tilt of a political argument in India often gets so filled with rhetoric – that the real, tangible issues are left unaddressed.

Last time I was in India, my friend took me to see his new apartment in a new highrise in newly developed Gurgaon. And as with all “upmarket” apartments now, the complex had its own water harvesting system and more tellingly its own generator. And that was telling. Our basic government provided civil amenities are breaking down.

Its not just about the economy or maintaining the growth (for which, power is a basic commodity). Its basic services to the common man – which are breaking down. We absolutely need more investment in infrastructure, in ports, in water management, in environment and also, in power.

The nuclear deal offers us a small part of one of these – we can leverage shared expertise of the NSG in onramping our nuclear power generation capabilities like we need to. Would this mean that we will be able to test a nuclear bomb without fear of repercussions? No, we wont. But the point is, even now we cannot. Atleast not without sanctions.

Would our foreign policies be impacted? Didn’t India vote for the resolution in the UN against Iran’s development of nuclear weapons recently? And that was before the 123. Point is, every mature nation defines its foreign policy, not based on some ideological basis ( like the United States did, with respect to Iraq, and is now suffering the consequences) but purely based on its short term and long term strategic interests. And if our strategic interests dictate that we go against the grain of the United States in some of our policy decisions, so be it.

It needs to be understood that American companies would be making very significant monetary deals as a result of this nuclear pact. And to renege the deal, even for the American government, wont be as easy as flipping the switch. They would also have to deal with domestic fallouts like the loss of jobs that will be created as a direct result of the deal.

My point is, while the deal attracts easy criticism – depending on the side of the political spectrum the observer is in – there are myriad complexities involved. And the deal itself is symbolic of many factors and realities.

And while I would love a debate, I would hate a debate based on purely ideological imperatives – like the Left front – or a purely political imperative – like the political right.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Categories: 123 Nuclear Deal · Current Affairs · Environment · India · News · Opinion · Philippic · Politics · Science · Technology

Sprint vs. ATT Wireless Service: Updated

August 29, 2007 · 13 Comments

Disclaimer: All the opinions expressed here are purely based on my experience. I would imagine most people would have similar experiences in the same geography – but regardless, my views here are based on my personal experience and experimentation. Regardless, the opinions expressed here are purely mine.

Just recently, I took the Acela Express from Metropark NJ to Washington Union Station. I know I have written about this topic more than once but I wanted to provide an update – because I see an abiding interest in my wireless specific posts and also because since I did this route after a while, I saw some service improvements that should be articulated for readers trying to figure out the best voice and data service across the Eastern seaboard of the United States.

As people who have followed this blog would know, I use both a Sprint and ATT phone service. I also have a Sprint broadband card constantly tethered to my laptop – one of the joys of having a life of being constantly on the road.

Data Coverage:

I cant compare the Sprint Broadband service to ATT Broadband service – just because I dont have an ATT wireless card – but courtesy of Good Messaging, I use data services pretty extensively on my ATT Treo 750.

So, I logged onto the Sprint broadband network the moment I got on the train at Metropark station NJ. I found the high speed EVDO network no problems. As we chugged along towards Philadelphia, I remember there used to be these holes at random places where EVDO would get bumped down to the slower Rx1TT – especially around Philadelphia station. All those holes seem to be now gone. There was constant EVDO service between Metropark and right after we left Philadelphia. Earlier, in the tunnel after the Philly station, the connection would get broken. This time around, while I wasn’t on EVDO – I was connected on Rx1TT. Never got disconnected. Got bumped up to EVDO again right after the tunnels and didnt get bumped down or disconnected till we reached close to Baltimore. There I did get disconnected – but only after I chose not to connect on roaming – this must be a firmware update on my card – I never got that earlier. And then after a 3-4 miles, I was back on EVDO all the way to the Union Station.

Verdict: I have consistently maintained that Sprint today offers the best high speed data network in the United States (to be significantly enhanced in the next couple of years courtesy Wimax) – and the network, atleast in the much-traveled New York-Washington corridor has definitely gotten much better. I got a lot of work done, sent out 3 meg powerpoints and downloaded a bunch of email. Breeze. You cant get better data service from any provider including Verizon Wireless.

About ATT Wireless (or ATT Mobility, as it is now called), the data network was fair. Didn’t even come close to Sprint – as a matter of fact, the whole route was scattered with coverage holes (I’ll come to that later) – but when we were in coverage, the data did download as expected. Of course, ATT data speeds dont even compare to Sprint – its EDGE network is closer to Rx1TT and doesnt stand a snuff to Sprint EVDO. While ATT is still deploying its HSDPA network (with theoretical speeds matching Sprint’s EDGE) but it is theoretical. I experimented with a HSDPA capable device (HTC 7500) and the speeds, while faster than EDGE, is visibly slower than EVDO. And I hear EVDO Rev 2 is noticeably faster.

But most compellingly, ATT Wireless does not have coverage even closely comparable to Sprint. And I talk about this based on my experiences traveling in California, Kansas, Washington, Boston, New York and all over New Jersey.

Verdict: ATT Wireless is spotty, slow and adequate at best. I would not recommend ATT Wireless for your mobile broadband needs, be it PC card based or high speed phone based services. There are significant coverage holes in the geography I covered – and since this is one of the most traveled corridors in the United States, it does not portend well to overall ATT coverage.

Voice Coverage:

I sort of expected the results I got, admittedly using random talk times on each of my phones. I was constantly on calls for about an hour and I swapped phones just to test out the coverage I got from each of the providers.

I know I would be going against the grain of established perception about the quality of networks especially given ATT’s claims of the “Fewest Dropped Calls” – but Sprint was far superior. In my prior experience with Verizon wireless, I would say that Sprint still wasn’t as good – but it was much improved and I hardly had any problems at all during my entire trip save those two very areas – the tunnels after the Philly station and when we were nearing Baltimore. Sprint offers free roaming for USD 5 per month – if I had that option enabled, I would have no coverage gaps – because where Sprint did not have signal – it had roaming. Important to mention here that one of the shortcomings of Sprint’s network is that the transition from in-network to roaming isnt seamless. The call always drops. Theoretically, if you have roaming enabled, it should not – but it does.

ATT Wireless had sporadic holes. I had atleast two dropped calls when the signal showed two bars. Especially around Southern New Jersey (where Sprint has pretty strong coverage), I went out of coverage with ATT atleast thrice. I wasnt using the phone at that time so I cant comment about how long they lasted -but based on the out of coverage beeps on my headset – lasted for about 30 seconds each on a fast moving Acela Express.

Verdict: Sprint was much superior to ATT again. Though it would be fair to point that Verizon Wireless has the best voice coverage – this based on my experience around 3 months ago.


Postscript: I get a lot of response when I write these posts – about how I am biased this way or that. I am not. I just believe a lot of public perception is based on the concerted and effective advertising – and sometimes the ground realities and user experiences are vastly different. I just recently signed on as an ATT subscriber , primarily because I wanted a GSM service provider and a phone I could carry overseas. I am writing this because my experiences are so utterly different from what the commercials promised and consequently, what I expected.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Categories: Opinion · Personal · Technology · Telecom · Telecom Network · Wireless
Tagged: , , , , , ,

123 Nuclear Deal, the Left and yet another mess

August 22, 2007 · 16 Comments

In the hallowed tradition of shooting ourselves in our own foot (or running around like headless chicken), the Indian Left has decided that they will consider withdrawing their support to the UPA if (and this is as of today) the Indian government goes ahead with negotiations with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). They aren’t opposed to representatives of the government meeting the IAEA mind you – just having substantive discussions with them.

Now as to why the government would meet with the IAEA if not to discuss the 123 deal is an open question.

But such juvenile tomfoolery based on ill-informed, outdated and a rigidly indoctrinated geo-political world view is only to be expected from the Left. The Communists after all, have an endemic dislike and distrust of anything American. Or industry. Or capital. Or enterprise. And from time to time, while they are spewing their anti- American, anti- Capitalist, anti-big industry venom – they have been known to indulge in monumentally foolhardy enterprises like banning English as the first language of instruction in schools of West Bengal (causing a generation of Bengalis in West Bengal, not fortunate enough to go to private catholic schools, to grow up being linguistically impaired in the universal language of commerce). Atleast in my home state of West Bengal, what they gave back in their rule since 1977 isn’t very visible – atleast not until the current CM decided to do a volte-face against the tenets of pure communism and went around the country asking for the Wipros/TCS/Infosys to invest there. This after computer education ( and any government office automation) was effectively banned in West Bengal because according to the Left, it was a “capitalist conspiracy”.

Anyways, I am digressing.

The point I am trying to make is that the Left has a depressingly bad governance record in the states they have ruled.

And for them to become the torch-bearers of national interest and patriotism makes me sick to the core. Especially, given the importance of the deal to India’s long term strategic interests.

I am the last person to fall for the line doing circles in the English language Indian media – about how the Left is more pro-China than pro-India – almost like they are Beijing’s proxy trouble creators intent on derailing the deal to suit China’s interests – but in acting like they have have planted themselves in a corner.

Way out? As with everything else in Indian politics – this has now ceased to be a rational informed discussion. Like for e.g. – the Left is opposed to an apparent non-binding clause in the Hyde Act about how the treaty would cease to exist incase India were to conduct nuclear tests. What they have failed to mention is that no nuclear power conducts nuclear tests anymore. Nuclear Tests are not required to maintain nuclear weapons – The data can now be computer simulated anyways. The only countries interested in a physical nuclear tests would be the likes of North Korea (which, I am sure, Karat and company, really admire). Nuclear Tests serve no tangible scientific purpose other than sabre rattling. Which India, being the country that we are, does not need to do.

So again, way out? In the absence of rudimentary knowledge, geo-political vision and the ability to look beyond short term popular political gains – this will eventually be a battle of egos. The only way out seems to be some kind of face saving political gesture by both the UPA and the Left. In the bargain, as always, the only thing to suffer would be India’s interests, the image of its democracy and the perception of the maturity of the leaders we elect in front of the electorate.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Categories: Current Affairs · Hypocrisy · India · News · Philippic · Politics · Science

August 15th

August 15, 2007 · Leave a Comment

60 years. And just starting to gather steam…

Happy Independence Day everyone.

Categories: India

Bottled Water

August 13, 2007 · 1 Comment

Personally, I never buy it – and I dont get it – every rare time I go to the supermarket to get some groceries – there seems to be one constant in everyone’s cart – bottled water. In a country, where tap water is as potable the bottled water.  And funny thing is, the most commonly bought bottled water isn’t even spring water or mineral water or the many kinds of waters people like to drink. Pepsi’s Aquafina for e.g. is just purified tap water. Damn it, you dont need any more purified water than the public supply guys. Give a chance for your anti-bodies to grow naturally, like nature intended. There’s a limit to how much sanitization is good for you. And let the earth survive.

Found this wonderful article on Time.com. Linking and reproducing. Its called “Back to the Tap”

 The U.N. estimates that 1.1 billion people around the world lack safe drinking water, a number that could reach 5 billion by 2025. Very few of them live in the U.S., however. Turn on a tap almost anywhere in America, and you’ll get clean, safe water–a minor miracle on much of the planet. But you wouldn’t know that from the giant plastic bottles of water that many of us haul around as if preparing for a stroll in the Sahara. Americans drank more than 8.25 billion gal. (more than 31 billion L) of bottled water in 2006, a 9.5% increase from the year before. We buy more bottled water than any other beverage except soft drinks, and soda’s market share is fizzling fast. Water sales topped $10.8 billion last year–all for something you can get virtually free. “It’s like marketing air,” marvels Allen Hershkowitz, an industrial ecologist with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

But the phenomenal growth in bottled water isn’t just draining our wallets–it’s also putting stress on the environment. It takes oil to make the plastic in all those bottles and oil to transport the water from its source to the consumer, and that means greenhouse gases–a primary cause of global warming. The NRDC estimates that 4,000 tons of CO2 is generated each year–the equivalent of the emissions of 700 cars–by importing bottled water from Fiji, France and Italy, three of the biggest suppliers to the U.S.

The pollution of the skies is matched by the trash left underfoot. Fewer than a quarter of plastic bottles are recycled, leaving 2 billion lbs. (900 million kg) a year to clog landfills. Worst of all, the migration to bottled water fosters a perception that tap water isn’t safe or necessary. That’s dangerous at a time when aging public-water systems need investment, particularly as global warming increases the incidence of drought. Says Gigi Kellett, director of the Think Outside the Bottle campaign for the watchdog group Corporate Accountability International: “An entire generation is growing up thinking they have to get their water out of a bottle.”

Those concerns are fueling a backlash against bottled water. San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom last month barred officials from using municipal funds to buy bottled water, while New York City launched a $1 million campaign this summer to encourage citizens to stick to the city’s famously clean public water. Salt Lake City’s mayor has asked public employees to stop supplying bottled water at municipal events. And a few top-flight restaurants that once would never have dreamed of serving tap are ditching the bottles. At Del Posto, Mario Batali’s newest spot in Manhattan, entrées can cost more than $40, but the restaurant isn’t interested in adding environmental cost–it will soon stop selling bottled water. Co-owner Joseph Bastianich says the Italian restaurant will instead serve diners its kitchen’s purified tap water, sparkling and still. “We try to run the restaurant more responsibly and sustainably,” says Bastianich. “The cost of shipping water all over the world and the packing don’t seem worth it.”

Bottled-water producers feel they’ve been ambushed. “I think the industry is being targeted unfairly,” says Patrick Racz, CEO of Icelandic Water. For one thing, bottled water weans consumers off soda. “People are making a substitution when they go to the fridge, so instead of getting a cola drink, they’re getting a bottle of water.” But the sheer speed with which bottled water is growing puts the industry under greater scrutiny. On the defensive, the International Bottled Water Association took out full-page newspaper ads on Aug. 3 touting the health benefits of drinking water.

That doesn’t mean we have to ban the bottle altogether; bottled water provides an essential stopgap when public water really isn’t safe. Like almost any other product, it can be made greener. Icelandic Water, for example, uses clean geothermal and hydropower energy to power its bottling plant. And the industry says it’s reduced the amount of plastic in bottles 40% over the past five years. But if we’re really going to cut the environmental cost of bottled water, the responsibility lies with consumers. It may be hard to do without the car–a much bigger source of CO2 than bottled water–and uncomfortable to forgo air-conditioning, but giving up the bottle is easy. Just turn on the tap.

Categories: Current Affairs · Environment · Global Warming · News

Global Warming gets a little boost: No Gas Tax Increase

August 10, 2007 · Leave a Comment

So President Bush decided not to raise the gas tax in the force-able future. He’s worried about the economy. And by extension, the working class American. And hence no debate can be brooked in this space lest one ires Mr. Dobbs of CNN – that tireless champion of middle class working America- and his ilk. Which of course, would imply, one would have to tolerate the venerable Mr. Dobbs, finger on the chin, condescendingly argue with his invited guests on this topic, every evening.
Dont get me wrong – I’m all for no-taxes -actually I’m for the government subsidizing gas so we can go our own merry ways buying those SUV’s with 500 horses. While we slowly choke the world. Who cares? As long as I have my oversized tyres and suspension.

Its for the EU anyways to raise asinine questions like carbon emission quotas, Kyoto protocols and limiting greenhouse gases. And Al Gore. But since good old Al isnt running for president ( and by definition, isnt discussing earth-shatteringly important topics like the role of gays in the military), who cares for him?

Thank you Mr. Bush. While Ford Motors is still struggling like a fish trying to breathe on the top of Mt. Everest, let me get their latest, biggest, meanest, baddest Explorer. And spew out as much carbon monoxide as ten thousand of those unlucky Somalis do in a year – on my weekly trip to Walmart ( but that’s to buy cheap “communist China-made” goods – now Mr. Dobbs is really going to be pissed:) )

And then, let me come up with a study funded by some conservative think tank, which in turn is funded by Exxon Mobile – to say, really, the problem is China and India. And Somalia. For cutting down all the trees.
Fishes!

Powered by ScribeFire.

Categories: Current Affairs · Environment · Global Warming · News · Opinion · Philippic

India:60 years of Independence.

August 8, 2007 · 2 Comments

What does it mean to be independent?

Have been thinking of this given that Independent India will be turning 60 in a week’s time on August 15th. So what does it mean to us? As Indians. As a nation. As a rising economic power in the world. In an increasingly global economy. And culture. What have we done right? And what, has gone horribly wrong? And what are the lessons learnt?

Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children would be 60 years old in a week. Serves as an apt metaphor to talk about the state of the nation. And us as a people.

So much has changed. And true to India’s paradoxical nature, so much is still exactly the same. Indeed so many things are so much worse.

A green revolution means enough food grains to feed a population of a billion people. Yet, according to experts, approximately 30% of food grains rot during the distribution process due to lack of storage facilities. We have great doctors and superlative medical technology and yet most people cannot afford it.

We are increasingly moving from being an IT delivery powerhouse to a hub for product software development, biotechnology, scientific research, pharmaceutical innovation and yet, our power infrastructure, our transportation infrastructure, our ports and airports are firmly ensconced in the lower echelons of Third World standards. We often lack potable water, even in our big cities. Things are changing yes, but not changing fast enough to overcome 50 years of utter neglect.

We are educating more – but increasingly, educating more poorly. We are building malls and yet, we cannot seem to find a housing solution for millions of immigrants from rural areas into our cities. We have more cars and motorcycles and scooters today than was imaginable even 5 years ago – and yet there is very limited environmental and collective social awareness in the country – top-down.

We are the world’s largest representative democracy – perhaps the world’s largest affirmative action program in action, in the words of Shashi Tharoor – and yet, our politics, our society and our moral ethos are scarred by caste loyalties – We still debate caste- ism in the most politically exploitative ways – without any long term imperatives and solutions. We have increasingly dishonest politicians, lower level of political discourse and debate, fractious political parties with small term agendas and everything else that comes with it. Our judiciary, though relatively free, is far from effective. Our courts are overloaded. Nothing moves. Our police force is often dishonest, brutal and lacks transparency. All too often, it brutalizes the weak – the poor, the disenfranchised and women. All too often, it works in cohorts with our RichPrivilegedDishonest. All too often. Or worse, with local politicians. Like, all too sadly, in Gujrat, during the riots, post Godhra.

And yet, a son of a rickshaw puller can make the IAS cadre if he is bright enough. And yet, there are people who work to improve the lives of people in villages, in cities and indeed in jails. We have Election Commissioners who do absolutely incredible work to pull off the biggest, most complex elections in the history of the human race without any major glitches. We have people who build a subway before time and under budget. We have a very non-political armed forces. We have institutions that still hold. We have world class companies who have increasingly well-defined social agendas and world-class reputations. Confident enough to go on acquisition sprees. Atleast in our metropolitan areas – women’s rights is not an argument anymore. We have an intelligentsia which, though stuck, in the isolated urban context – is thriving. Our film industry, arts and crafts are thriving – and increasingly getting more international exposure and recognition – leading to gradual, though sometimes uneven, fiscal benefits to everyone involved. As a percentage of the population, more people read newspapers in India than any other country of the world. Even though our illiteracy rates hover around 50%. The rate of growth of the newspaper industry growth is the highest in the world. From Bloomberg’s website:

Three of the 10 best performers are in India, where the economic growth rate is triple that of the U.S. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. has surged 81 percent, HT Media Ltd. has rallied 66 percent and Jagran Prakashan Ltd. is up 56 percent. Two others are in China, the world’s fastest-growing major economy.

But, most of all, we have a people who can vote out a Hindu majority party in a country that is 84% Hindu in a religiously charged time. A time when most “educated pundits” would predict otherwise. We have a people who can share a country with their country-men who are so diverse religiously, ethnically, culturally, linguistically – and still live in relative peace – we still dont have asinine debates on TV about how only “one language” can define a country. We have a people who can let millions of refugees from Bangladesh and scour their meager resources and not have a riot.

And hence, 60 years after Independence we have hope. Because of nothing greater than our people. Our diversity. Our tolerance. And a hunger for success that comes from years upon years of being stuck in a place with no ostensible future.

But finally, we are coming our own. We are getting where we always should have been – in the elite group of modern and enlightened nations with open societies, freedom of thought, diversity, justice and economic opportunity.

Happy Independence Day everyone, when it finally dawns on August 15th!

Postscript: I re-read the post. Almost came across as if India as a success started with the liberalization in the 90’s. Couldn’t have mis-communicated more. In my mind, a lot of the factors that came together to allow India the head start when we actually started opening up were created in the socialist era. Not so much in the Indira, but the Nehru. Our educational institutions. Our laws. Our fundamental apolitical military force. Our more efficient PSUs. Yes, there were many things that were not right. But many things were.

My father was in Border Roads, an Engineer. He spent his youth in very very remote regions building roads in some of the most hostile terrains in the world – roads that now connect our vast and diverse country. Leh (highest motorable road in the world), Nagaland, Mizoram, Rajasthan, Sikkim. And that happened way before the liberalization.

Categories: India · News · Opinion · Personal

New Apple iMacs

August 8, 2007 · 1 Comment

After the Macbook, the iPhone, now its the turn of the iMacs. Yesterday Apple refreshed its iMac line of desktops.

Some of the updates were pretty predictable – Intel Core 2 Duo processors ( the same line of Intel processors that now power Apple’s entire line of laptops – both the Macbook and Macbook Pro). There are 2 monitor sizes – two 20 inch and a 24 inch model. All the standard Apple jazz is included – iSight, iLife, Superdrive CD/DVD drives.

The one radical change is the new slim keyboard- modeled after the Macbook keyboard – recessed keys built into the body. Looks very very good – and I would imagine – since the form factor is similar to the keyboard – it would solve a primary irritant for a lot of people (author included) who work interchangeably on both a laptop and a desktop – adjusting to one keyboard and then the other.

Design and aesthetics are trademark Apple – very Euro chic. Its built out of a single sheet of Aluminum – and according to the Apple website, there are no exposed screws save one at the bottom for access to the RAM slots.

Having worked on an Apple for a while now – I have to say that the overall Apple experience is substantially superior to Windows – both from an OS standpoint ( as a data point, my Macbook averages about 25 seconds to startup) and from the standpoint of bundled software – the out of the box Apple iLife software suite is actually usable. There aren’t any shareware bundled (apart from a trial iWorks suite) and in my informal impressions during the last 3-4 months – seems to be a lot more stable – only expected from a Unix based OS.

Now,only if I could get one of these goodies!

Categories: Apple · Gadgets · Technology